# UniFi Protect Doorbell / Chime Current State — 2026-05-26 Purpose: capture the current known-good state for the adopted doorbell and the two Protect WiFi chimes so future cleanup work does not accidentally re-run a reverted change. ## Status summary Current known-good state: - `front-doorbell` remains the Protect doorbell endpoint - Protect WiFi Chime `upstairs landing` is intentionally on `Management` / default `UniFi Wireless` - Protect WiFi Chime `Living Room` is intentionally on `Management` / default `UniFi Wireless` - per-client Camera virtual-network overrides for the chimes should remain disabled unless a later validation proves a safe Protect path on the Camera/Security lane Current chime IPs from the last known-good state: - `upstairs landing` -> `10.5.0.123` - `Living Room` -> `10.5.0.189` ## What changed from the earlier migration notes Historical 2026-05-22 action: - both chimes were moved from `Management` to `Camera` using per-client virtual network overrides - UniFi Network showed them associated on the target lane Why that is not the source of truth anymore: - in this environment, the Camera-lane override made the chimes show offline in Protect even though UniFi Network still showed them connected - the working fix was to remove the Camera override and let the chimes return to the known-good Management/default-SSID path Operational conclusion: - treat the 2026-05-22 chime move as a historical experiment, not a standing recommendation - do not re-home the chimes to `Camera` / `Security` as routine cleanup without fresh Protect validation ## Doorbell adoption note After a doorbell is re-adopted: - verify the chimes are still logically bound to the current adopted doorbell object - if chime ringing breaks even though the devices are online, check whether each chime's `ringSettings.cameraId` still points at the old doorbell object instead of the current adopted one This is separate from the network-lane issue: - network-lane failure symptom: chime looks connected in UniFi Network but offline in Protect - adoption-binding failure symptom: doorbell is adopted and devices are online, but the chimes do not ring for the current doorbell object ## Future-state intent versus current safe state Long-term design intent still favors a dedicated Camera/Security lane and SSID for Protect accessories. Current safe live state is narrower: - doorbell can stay where it is if healthy - chimes stay on Management/default `UniFi Wireless` until Protect connectivity is explicitly re-validated on the Camera/Security lane - future migration is blocked on proving the required Protect path, not on re-discovering the device identities ## Files that were updated to reflect this Key current-truth docs: - `network-migration-remaining-checklist-2026-05-22.md` - `unifi-client-cleanup-shortlist-2026-05-22.md` - `unifi-client-rehome-results-2026-05-22.md` - `unifi-ssid-cleanup-proposal-2026-05-23.md` - `network-redesign-plan.md` - `network-redesign-implementation-runbook.md` Historical planning/snapshot docs were also marked so they are not mistaken for current next-step instructions.